Archive | Shorts RSS feed for this section

Cold Tracker (Short Film) (2012)

4 Apr

stills_ColdTracker2

Smith’s Verdict: ***

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

“Cold Tracker” is a short Western, set in the American Civil War era, about a man who returns home to rural Arkansas after serving in the war, only to find that his wife had been murdered only the day before. With the law unwilling to go after the bandits responsible, the man takes matters into his own hands and sets out to track them down himself.

It sounds like a standard story for a Western, but what makes it interesting is the way the titular cold tracker (Scott McEntire) is struggling with the conflict of dealing with the loss of his wife (Mandy Fason), whom he knows he could have protected if he returned just one day earlier. While he’s on this crusade to track down her killers, he is accompanied by a vision of his wife that aids him as he continues. This leads to the choice of what to do when he actually finds them. Will he kill them in order to avenge his wife, or will he let the law do the job?

All of this occurs in a running time of 13 minutes (well, 12 minutes, excluding the credits), creating a brisk pace and not stopping for anything pointless. The flashbacks are placed properly in intersecting with the ongoing story, and the film even manages to leave room for one effective dramatic scene—a flashback in which the tracker leaves for war and tells his crying wife goodbye. This makes his journey all the more effective in that you know how much guilt he feels in knowing that was the last time he would see her alive.

My only quibbles with “Cold Tracker” are minor. Some line-readings are a bit stilted (but for the most part, they’re spot-on). And also, being a 13-minute short with enough story material for 20 minutes (at least), parts of the film felt a bit rushed, and unfortunately so does the ultimate resolution/redemption for the hero. It’s there, but it feels hurried. But to the film’s credit, the ending, what follows that scene, does have enough weight to continue to feel for what has occurred before.

“Cold Tracker” was written and directed by Leon Tidwell, the visually-impaired Arkansas filmmaker who also made the amusing short “The Conversation.” That was a film that allowed him to show, in a narrative metaphorical way, the frustrations in finding work because of his disability. With “Cold Tracker,” it’s clearer that this is a guy who truly loves movies and is determined to keep making movies despite his visual impairment. And I further look forward to seeing his latest work, because “Cold Tracker” is a good short film that continues to showcase the talent of this skillful filmmaker.

NOTE: The film can be seen here: https://vimeo.com/68456516

December 1982 (Short Film) (2013)

2 Apr

578532_284852491618663_378177824_n

Smith’s Verdict: ***1/2

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

Imagine an era without texting, email, or even the Internet. If you wanted to talk to a girl or ask her out, you had to call her house and ask a parent if she was home. If for some reason you wanted to talk to someone from a different country, you had to send that person a letter and hope that person responds the next day or two, so you can continue the conversation.

As the 30-minute film “December 1982” opens, in August 1981, high-school student Tim (Haulston Mann) is given an assignment to write and send a letter to a student in Beirut. Tim would rather focus on his photography than write a letter to someone he doesn’t know. But then he gets the idea to take a picture of a move on a chessboard in his bedroom, and decides to send that to the student, along with the message, “Want to play?” In Beirut, Yara Hajjar (Ashli Brown) receives this, and responds by sending a picture of a counter-move on her own chessboard.

Months pass, and Tim and Yara’s pen-pal relationship continues. Tim has graduated from high school and is trying to decide what to do with his future. He wants to attend a Chicago university for his photography, but is faced with the difficulties of leaving his hometown friends and knowing that his parents would have to pay a lot to send Tim to college hundreds of miles away. But as Tim faces his own future, Yara and her family find themselves in the midst of something more terrifying, as Israeli military forces invade their country and a war brews outside their home.

This pen-pal relationship that forms between Tim (in Central Arkansas) and Yara (in Beirut) is quite interesting, especially how similar interests, such as chess and photography, keeps them talking to each other. Sometimes one has to wait a couple days for the next letter from the other, but when that letter comes, it leaves them with happiness even when one of them should feel miserable. This is especially effective in the scenes that feature Yara in a time when the world around her becomes a nightmare because of the war—when everything outside her family’s apartment building becomes a living hell, what gives Yara a moment of joy is the next letter from Tim.

“December 1982,” written and directed by Lyle Arnett, Jr. (as his thesis film for the University of Central Arkansas Digital Filmmaking Master of Fine Arts Program), is a small gem. It’s a touching, well-made, effective story of how these two young people draw closer to each other, despite being different parts of the world.

I also admired how the film told its subplot involving the 1982 Lebanon War. It mostly uses sound effects in the Beirut scenes, and that actually works in the film’s favor. There are two particularly-powerful scenes that focus on characters’ reactions. One features the first explosion heard, as Yara is enjoying a sunset at the beach, looking at one of Tim’s pictures that he sent, when suddenly there’s an explosion in the distance as she turns around in fright.

The second particularly-powerful scene features Yara having dinner with her brother and widowed mother. It’s a quiet moment until the sounds of muffled explosions that suddenly turns more dangerous when they seem too close. This is arguably the best scene in the film—the reactions seem surprisingly genuine.

But most of the film focuses more on Tim’s story as he realizes his potential, realizes his friends aren’t the best crowd to be around, and explores Chicago to see what living there would be like. (Also, the scenes set in Tim’s family’s house show (actual) TV news footage on the living-room TV set to show/tell more about the war, and the raid in Beirut, which is admittedly a clever move.) Now, you could argue that maybe Tim’s story is less interesting than Yara’s. Of the two, the latter has the least amount of screen time. And I’m not going to lie—I kind of wished I had seen more of how Yara and her family react to their situation. But to be honest, Tim’s side is still handled well and besides, maybe less is more.

The ending left me with kind of a mixed feeling. On the one hand, it is a satisfying conclusion that did make me smile (and it left a satisfying impression on the audience I saw this film with, as well). But on the other hand, it left me with a question of how it came to this. Even though most audience members of the screening probably expected it, and they were pleased to see this resolution, I was a bit confused as to how exactly it came to be. Without giving too much away, this feeling had to do with how little was shown of Yara’s story.

But for the most part, “December 1982” is an impressive, well-put-together short film. It’s intelligent in its writing and directing, as Arnett, Jr. delivers admirable work as a filmmaker; the actors (including Mandy Fason and Kenn Woodard in brief but pivotal roles as Tim’s parents) are convincing, especially Ashli Brown in a role that requires a gambit of emotions; the central setup is fascinating as you consider the true sentiment that comes with handwritten letters after a while; the drama is credibly handled; and the film itself is a true delight.

NOTE: The film can be seen here: https://vimeo.com/62781258

A Wheel & the Moon (Short Film) (2013)

2 Apr

625488_445476658865564_1831939262_n

Smith’s Verdict: ***1/2

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

“I’ve never really wondered what it would be to lose part of myself. To not feel like a whole person again. Losing someone I love is one thing…but to go on living while part of me dies…” That inner thought that opens the short film “A Wheel & the Moon” says a lot. What if you knew for sure that you were going to lose your vision? What would you feel? What would you do?

Adapted from Jonathan Carroll’s short story, “A Wheel in the Desert, the Moon on some Swings,” and made as a graduate thesis film for University of Central Arkansas’ Digital Filmmaking Master-of-Fine-Arts Program, Chris Paradis’ “A Wheel & the Moon” is about a young man named Norman, who learns he is indeed going blind and tries to imagine his life without eyesight. He finds himself wandering his hometown, hoping to find some way to find something positive about this. The best he can come up with is to buy a camera and take as many pictures as he can that capture the world around him.

“A Wheel & the Moon” effectively tells an interesting tale of how Norman (Justin Pike in an effective low-key performance) continues to try and find the optimistic side to what he fears will come. The people he encounters along the way are interesting and surprisingly, given their short amount of screen time (for a film that is about 20 minutes in running time), have distinct personalities. In particular, there’s a homeless man (Tucker Steinmetz) who claims to be blind and tells Norman what he misses most about not seeing (fried chicken); Norman’s caring sister (Sarah Holderfield); and a makeup artist (Angy Champine) who manages to give Norman a good idea of what he’ll look like “in 50 years”; among others. These are all appealing characters that our protagonist encounters on his personal journey that ultimately results in him finding himself.

The only thing I didn’t particularly like about “A Wheel & the Moon,” which is otherwise a competently-made film that works as slice-of-life and an effective, non-manipulative feel-good drama, was the ending. I can tell there’s a heartwarming message to be said about enjoying the oddness and beauty of life, but it was kind of hard to take it in because it feels somewhat rushed. Although to be fair, I should note that the sequence that comes before that final bit did an effective job at delivering the necessary emotional drive by itself.

“A Wheel & the Moon” is an effective short drama. It actually kind of reminded me of UCA alum Sarah Jones’ MFA film last year, “John Wayne’s Bed,” in that each short film treated its story and its audience with enough regard that it didn’t have to succumb to melodramatic formulas just to make us care—it just efficiently told the story. “A Wheel & the Moon” is moving, and it’s well-done, and it works.

SIDE-NOTE: I love this line about the fried chicken, said in an earlier scene in which Norman encounters the blind homeless man—“Fried chicken is three things—smell, taste, and sight…You gotta see it to really eat it.” KFC would probably kill for that slogan.

Amid Amor (Short Film) (2010)

18 Feb

mqdefault

Smith’s Verdict: ****

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

(Originally reviewed in Spring 2011)

“Amid Amor” is a most pleasant surprise. It’s a seven-minute short film made by teen-cousin filmmaking prodigies Andrew and Matthew McMurry for the 48 Hour Film Project in Little Rock, Arkansas. And I must say, it’s very impressive and surprisingly treasurable for a film with such a short length. This short film won the Audience B Award at the 48 Hour festival—it’s easy to see why.

Andrew and Matthew McMurry take unusual measures for this new project, compared to their other projects. For one thing, they don’t star in it—they have a unique screen presence in their previous work. For another, they have story help from Michael Scott, the filmmaker behind the “Scot Murray” film series (my guilty-pleasure films) on Vimeo. But some of their trademarks are present—the comedic effect of special effects (forgive that pun), the whimsical directing style, and the odd-but-charming storyline.

Michael Scott stars as Ben, who is actually Cupid. Yes, the Cupid. We see in an opening scene that he can shoot balls of light from his hands that cause a man and woman to fall in love—kind of a cheat, but hey it’s Cupid. Ben leads kind of a superhero life in the way he can’t tell anyone who he is or show his abilities. He’s also the person you’d least expect to be Cupid. He has no tutu, wings, or bow-and-arrow and he’s not the best-looking guy in town. But Michael Scott is a nice choice for the role. His personality and tone of voice would remind people of Barry White crossed with Bill Murray. In that way, he’s a perfect casting choice for Cupid—just a smooth-talking average Joe…who is anything but smooth.

Austin Blunk, star of the “Scot Murray” series, plays Ben’s best friend Geoff Cooke, a camp counselor who tells Ben about Camp Kettle (one of the 48 Hour requirements was to mention a camp counselor named Geoff Cooke). Ben and Geoff are sitting on a bench in the local park when a girl named Gina catches Ben’s eye—they both are reading John Grisham novels; nice touch. Ben is nervous talking to her—hey, just because Cupid can make people fall in love, that doesn’t make him a ladies’ man. So just this once, he tries to use his powers to make her fall in love with him. But the plan backfires and Gina instead falls in love with Geoff, so they spend a wonderful afternoon together while Ben can only watch.

And that’s not the end of the movie. I don’t know if you can believe that. I shouldn’t spoil the ending for you, but I will say that it has a good message—you can’t force love. It’s subtle and very sweet.

Austin Blunk isn’t given a lot to do in the acting department because he’s given very little screen time—well, what’d you expect when Cupid is the lead character in a seven-minute film? But given the circumstances, that’s amazing. Let me explain—as Scot Murray, Austin Blunk was the irrepressible, ruthless loudmouth who wouldn’t shut up. But here, he’s calm and relaxed. This is not the Austin Blunk I recognize.

Anyway, why is Gina worth it for Cupid to break his own rules? Because she’s played by Enji Wagster (credited as Angie Wagster), that’s why! She made this film on her day off from performing for my romantic-comedy-drama-fantasy, “Interior/Exterior.” That was the movie in which Enji played my character’s romantic interest, who was mainly a voice in my head until we saw how beautiful she was in a mirror in one scene. In this film “Amid Amor,” she has the same acting treatment as Austin Blunk, but hey, she’s beautiful and fun.

“Amid Amor” is solid proof—Andrew and Matthew McMurry are filmmakers. They have the equipment, they have the special effects (the balls of light that Cupid shoots out of his hands), they have the stories, and they have the direction. These are the guys responsible for two of my favorite short films, “9/19/2055” and “Dad vs. Boy” (both of which can be found on www.youtube.com/user/pinnaclepointstudios along with this one). “Amid Amor” is their best film and I will make room for it on my Best Films of 2010 list. I mean it; it’s that good.

Cotton County Boys (Short Film) (2011)

18 Feb

timthumb.php

Smith’s Verdict: ***1/2

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

One of the films I looked forward to seeing at the 5th Annual Little Rock Film Festival in early June 2011 was “Cotton County Boys,” Collin Buchanan’s senior thesis film for the UCA (University of Central Arkansas) Filmmaking Program. What drew my attention to it was its clever, 70s-retro-style 3-minute trailer and its cast, which included Levi Agee (film columnist for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette), Lynnsee Provence (actor in “Shotgun Stories”), and Natalie Canerday (the mother from “Sling Blade”).

So on June 5th, 2011 in Little Rock, I saw “Cotton County Boys” (which is 30 minutes long) when it was screened with five other short comedies made in Arkansas. I was hoping to like it…and fortunately I did. This is an enjoyable short comedy with a lot of laughs and many moments when I had a smile on my face. It also has a heart—the film fit right into its LRFF category title, which was “Hijinks and Heart.”

The titular Cotton County Boys are three dim-witted but well-meaning Southern brothers who still live with their mother and spend most of their time messing around and shooting each other with 4th-of-July rockets. That’s actually how the movie opens—one of the brothers smells the morning air in a brief tender moment right before the others playfully shoot fireworks at him.

The conflict of the story is that the Cotton family needs to come up with $12,000 to save the family house from foreclosure (it was originally $11,000 until one of the brothers broke the process server’s car’s back window). So the brothers—Bobby (Terrell Case), Bo (Levi Agee, who also co-produced this film and is credited here as “Reuben Agee”), and Sammy (Lynnsee Provence) Cotton—decide to go job-hunting. Bobby finds a job at a fast-food restaurant, where he develops a crush on the attractive co-worker Hattie (Kelsie Louise Craig), and Bo and Sammy find a job painting birdhouses. (This is shown in a montage, which features cameos by Arkansas Democrat-Gazette film critic Philip Martin and Candyce Hinkle, who played the landlady in “True Grit.”) Soon enough, though, they get the idea to win the money by making their own funny home videos and sending them into their mother’s favorite TV show, which can be seen as a clone of “America’s Funniest Home Videos.”

This results in multiple shots to the crotch and other injuries. Now, as tired as I am of the comedic “shots to the crotch” cliché, it works here because a) they’re still funny here and b) they help serve the story. The sequences in which the boys film their own stunts using the family video camera are amusing, fun to watch, and actually about something. This could have been a formulaic romp about cardboard characters who simply run around nearly getting themselves killed. But no—director Collin Buchanan is very careful in making us empathize with the characters. They’re not completely idiotic—in fact, Bobby, Bo, and Sammy are smart in their own way. And everything they do is for the family. This is where part of the film’s heart comes into place. There are also some brief awkwardly-funny but somewhat-sweet moments between Bobby and Hattie, although their relationship could have gotten a little further before the emotional payoff at the end. Actually, this is what cost the film half-a-star. Maybe if the film were a little longer so it could have a few more moments with Bobby and Hattie, this would have gotten four stars instead of three-and-a-half.

But the true heart of “Cotton County Boys” lies within the relationship of the Cotton family. Terrell Case, Levi Agee, and Lynnsee Provence give good performances as these likable characters and have a nice rapport with each other, as well as with Natalie Canerday, who plays their mother. They add to the humor and heart of this endearing short film. But wait! What review of a movie with ridiculous stunts could resist the joke, “Don’t try this at home?”

Foot Soldier (Short Film) (2011)

18 Feb

Foot_Soldier2-1317227267

Smith’s Verdict: ****

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

Oh boy… how am I going to talk my way through this one? To tell the honest truth, it’s hard for me to explain why this unusual short film “Foot Soldier” works. It just sort of does. It’s weird with its odd little touches that move the story along, but it’s also exceedingly original and very well-executed.

Foot Soldier” is a Southern Gothic tale with cinematography that captures the essence of the backwoods of the South. It’s desolate, yet comforting and wistful. Making his way through a small town with that sense is a door-to-door Bible salesman named Emmitt (Dustin Alford, giving an excellent performance with a convincing blend of innocence, gullibility, and sorrow). Emmitt is apparently homeless, as he wakes up in an abandoned house and has very little money in his pocket. He lives by his belief in God and by his door-to-door sales.

Oh, and he also has this habit of stuffing the inside of his shoes with pebbles and gravel, so that he’ll endure the pain to continue with his faith, while attempting to continue his sales. But it’s after an uncomfortable encounter with a sleep-around (Natalie Canerday) that Emmitt starts to lose his faith and see things in a new, twisted way. But his next attempt at challenging his own faith leads to a new view on life.

I don’t want to give too much away, except that after that encounter, Foot Soldier features Emmitt as he makes a ill-advised choice and then finds himself in the company of…well, about the one who delivers helpful advice, you will either accept, laugh at, or (possibly) be offended. In fact, the entire second half of “Foot Soldier” had me questioning why it worked as well as it did, considering the choices being made. But I am praising it for its originality and its sense of humanity. When “Foot Soldier” was over, I found myself wishing to see more of this protagonist’s journey, and oddly enough, I found myself enjoying the little things in life a little more.

The Conversation (Short Film) (2011)

18 Feb

mqdefault

Smith’s Verdict: ***1/2

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

The Conversation features the chronicles of a blind hit man, although he constantly reminds the reporter that’s interviewing him that he’s not “blind,” but “visually impaired.” And yes, it turns out there is a difference. The hit man — Trench (well-played by Chad Bradford) — explains it to the reporter (Paige Reynolds, whose overly polite manner in this film makes me wonder if she can play a psychopath) in honest terms, and that most people don’t know it. They either say to him, “Oh you’re blind — let me help you” or “You can see — get it yourself.”

The Conversation tells Trench’s story in just ten minutes and it’s a nicely-done dark comedy about the ups and downs of being visually-impaired and a mercenary. Flashbacks are shown as a way of answering the reporter’s questions. Does he use his disability as an advantage? How do his relationships work out? What are his thoughts on the blind and music? Where does he have the most problems dealing with people? Does he hire a driver to drive him to his hits? Do people pick on him?

All of these questions are answered in a very funny way, with fresh writing displayed here. My favorite is how he responds to the question of where he has the most trouble—“Restaurants.” I wouldn’t dare give away how he reads the food menu. These jokes make you laugh, but they also make you think. Just about every question that’s answered in this movie—broadly or subtly—serves as credible accuracy.

The Conversation was written and directed by Leon Tidwell, who himself is visually impaired. My guess is he wanted to show that “blind” and “visually impaired” are totally different. In an interview with Arkansas Democrat-Gazette film columnist Levi Agee, he claims that the inspiration for The Conversation was his own experiences. He’s not a hit man, but he did have frustrations in finding work because of his disability—it comes across through the character of Trench in this film. The Conversation is a terrific short film (at ten minutes, it’s not too fast or too slow; it’s just right); I look forward to Leon Tidwell’s further work.

NOTE: The interview with Leon Tidwell by Levi Agee can be found here

Ballerina (Short Film) (2011)

18 Feb

film_June

Smith’s Verdict: ****

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

“What I’m about to tell you is hard to believe — I only ask that you hear me out.”

This is the start of a bizarre conversation between two men—one of which is telling the other something that is indeed hard to believe. What he’s about to say will shatter one’s vision of reality. That’s the setup for the short film Ballerina, which tells a story in an unusual way—just telling the story. The whole film’s running time of 16 minutes is centered around these two men—one talks, the other listens and reacts. It works because it’s acted with such conviction and credibility, and filmed with a disturbing mood to sink us in, that I found myself (risking a little embarrassment here) mouthing the word “Wow.”

Presented in black-and-white, we see a man named Frank Gross (Dean Denton) sitting in his living room on a quiet afternoon, reading a book as his young daughter Katie (Weslee Denton) draws pictures. It seems like a quiet, normal day until the doorbell rings. Frank answers the door; a man in a suit—Dr. David Sinclair (Ed Lowry)—stands outside, asking for a moment of Frank’s time. What is this about, Frank asks. “What I’m about to tell you is hard to believe—I only ask that you hear me out.” Sinclair starts by performing a few parlor tricks, but are they really tricks? (“I’m bad at that sort of thing,” he explains.) For example, he tells Frank to pick up the book he was reading and pick two numbers between 1 and 20. He does, and then states what word is on what line and order with those same numbers! He then proceeds to state the family history, including Frank’s current job and his deceased wife. At this point, you’re wondering what is going on here, who this strange person is, why he’s here, what he’s going to say next, etc. What follows is quite unusual, very odd, and just so intriguing. Watching this film, you can either be very invested, very disturbed, or both.

How do I explain just how powerful Ballerina is without going into too much detail about the further-developed plot points, especially in a short film? Even though most of you reading this review have seen the film online by now, I stick to methods of reviewing.

Sinclair’s words dig deeper and deeper into the strangeness, and the fear he delivers to Frank is legitimate. Frank doesn’t want to believe what he’s hearing, but Sinclair sounds so convincing that neither he, nor we, can argue. Even when Frank is about to snap and say he’s wrong, he still isn’t so sure. And when he’s finally convinced, he knows that there’s no turning back from this. As the film progresses, you can really feel the uneasiness that is existent throughout. A lot of credit for that has to go to the cinematography (by Dave Calhoun) that actually manages to turn a living room into an effectively unpleasant setting; the screenplay (by David Koon, of The Bloodstone Diaries) for taking a intriguing, unique science-fiction story and mixing it with realism, making it all plausible (keeping it in this one familiar living-room area, the casual introductory talk before Frank and Sinclair begin their central talk, how Frank reacts to certain elements, etc.) and making for a great script; the director Bryan Stafford (cinematographer for the wonderful Gerry Bruno short Seven Soulsand Juli Jackson’s upcoming feature 45 RPM) for managing to get the most out of what little space there is to work with. And of course, credit must also be given to the two lead actors Ed Lowry and Dean Denton, who both deliver excellent work. Lowry has the most difficult role, being the one who has to deliver this speech about what will occur if a certain choice is or isn’t made. He pulls it off with chilling success.

Ballerina is so strange, so disturbing, and yet so effective that I’ll even go as far as saying it reminded me of the best “Twilight Zone” episodes. It’s a tense, intelligent short film that tells a gripping story, shows that any location (whether common or beyond) can be used to create a unique setting, is exceptionally well-made, and keeps us invested the whole time.

You can watch the film here: https://vimeo.com/34816825

The Bloodstone Diaries: Sleeper – The Bloodstone Diaries: The Thief of All Things

17 Feb

bloodstone-katysmall

Smith’s Verdict: ***

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

The Bloodstone Diaries: Sleeper, as I’ve heard, is the start of a possible Internet series, and right away, I want to state my gratitude for a web series with quality production. It also works nicely on the big screen, where is how I first saw it at the Ozark Foothills Filmfest in the spring of 2011. There’s a real professional look to the film, which would make it somewhat of a disappointment that this introduction to The Bloodstone Diaries is merely good, when it could have been great.

What I mean by that is that the story seems complex—that is, the tidbits we get from the story—for a ten-minute short film that leaves many holds barred and stops rather than ends. I’m guessing it’s setting up for the next entry in the series, but I think I’d be more satisfied if there was more closure to this one. I wanted more, which shows how interested I was in the dilemma that’s been set up. Luckily, I think I’ll get more when the next entry to this series is released, either on the screen at film festivals, or online.

The film starts with an opening-credit sequence—the credits are played over a black screen in an old-school fashion, but we get our introduction to our heroine Bettie Lawrence (Katy Allen, wife of “American Idol” Kris Allen) from the audio of a telephone call. She warns a mysterious man, whom she’s apparently tangled with in the past, that she has learned how to use a magic jewel called the Bloodstone and that it wouldn’t be wise to look for her (anymore). That’s it—that’s the introductory exposition we get. It’s very smart writing. A mysterious phone conversation during the opening credits is all we needed to set this up…all in 30 seconds, too!

When we see Bettie in person, she seems like a nice all-American girl with nothing particularly special about her, making her a credible heroine once we realize that the Government is hunting her because she gains possession of the jewel, which is what they want. They’ve killed her husband Sam, who tried to protect it in the past (at least I think that’s why they killed him—it’s never quite explained), and now she wants revenge. When they find her, she’ll be ready.

This setup is very intriguing—the mystery is there, the story sounds very interesting, the acting from Katy Allen is convincing, and the drama is legit. But that’s only the first six minutes out of a ten-minute film. The final three minutes (not including the end credits, taking the last minute of course) is just a showdown with the bad guys—the Men in Black—who arrive at her home and try to overtake her. As she escapes, she uses the Bloodstone to fight them. And because this climax is so short, there isn’t much room or time for either atmosphere or clarity in exactly what this Bloodstone is capable of. I guess it allows the holder of the stone to possess mind power (Bettie’s able to move a refrigerator without touching it), but what are we supposed to take from all of this? I guess Bettie will keep running and somehow on her quest, she’ll finally have her revenge. While this climax is admittedly well-shot and does have its brief moments, it’s too short and doesn’t take advantage of what should have been a dramatic payoff.

I would like to see “part two” to see where this is going to go. But I would particularly like to see an origin story. How did this young woman get involved in this craziness with the Bloodstone anyway? That would be a very interesting story arc.

You can watch this film here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl0Kx4jBg4I

————————————————————————————————————————-

bettie-and-sam

Smith’s Verdict: ***

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

The Bloodstone Diaries: The Thief of All Things is what I’ve been waiting for since I first watched its predecessor, The Bloodstone Diaries: SleeperThe Bloodstone Diaries is a supposed web series (I use the term “supposed” since it’s apparently screening at film festivals before hitting the Internet) that mixes fantasy with action. It’s about a young woman who possesses an ancient, magic jewel known as the Bloodstone and seeks revenge on those who killed her husband; these same people also seek her to possess the jewel themselves. Sleeper was a welcome beginning that left me wanting more. And I got more from The Thief of All Things, which is actually a prequel instead of a sequel. It shows the events leading up to most of what occurs in Sleeper.

We see the origins of Bettie Lawrence (Katy Allen), the heroine of the series. She lives in a homeless camp by the railroad tracks with her husband Sam (Ian Moore). Bettie is a standoffish, hostile person who doesn’t let anything get in her way (including the local reverend who preaches to most of the homeless) and is the one who goes into town to steal valuables from people’s cars, while Sam lives mainly by faith. Sam’s friend Anthony Pace (C. Tucker Steinmetz) lives the same way, as well as a belief in destiny. That’s why when he mentions the Bloodstone, said to be a jewel mostly formed of Jesus’ blood, Sam can’t help but be interested.

By the way, one of my favorite moments is when Sam researches the Bloodstone. How does Sam find out more about the Bloodstone? Wikipedia, of course! (Duh!) But it turns out that searching online for something mystical and said to be mythical gains the attention of the government. The next day, several men in black reach the homeless camp to hunt down Anthony and Sam, with Bettie in tow. But Anthony has a few tricks up his sleeve…

The central chase scene is well-executed and feels very intense. The special effects are seamless—there’s one slow-motion scene involving Anthony using the power of the Bloodstone to stop a pursuing car by making it float into the air, and it’s done so greatly that I wonder if Andrew McMurry of YouTube’s AndrewMFilms, with his After Effects skills, would be able to pull that off. There was a real quality put into this production, and the filmmakers obviously went all out to make this an exciting experience. For the most part, they succeed.

And it is nice to see the original owner of the Bloodstone, as well as the lives of Bettie and Sam before the events of Sleeper.

There are a few problems I have with the movie, though. For one thing, I can’t quite believe that the Bloodstone has been protected for centuries, one protector after the other. First of all, have the people before these men in black really had no avail whatsoever? And if they didn’t, wouldn’t they have just given up the search after seeing what the power of the Bloodstone can do? Other little weaknesses are the lame subtitles that appear over each new location—one of them being, “miles from nowhere” — and the unnecessary opening dream sequence that shows Bettie losing a fatally wounded Sam, obviously foreshadowing a future event.

It came as no surprise that both Sam and Anthony are dead by the end of The Thief of All Things, because of course, Bettie must be the new lone protector of the Bloodstone. But somehow, the ending of this film never really hit the right notes. It ended a little too quickly, and I could have used a little more development for Bettie, whose question of faith and sudden new responsibility have been set up for an emotional payoff that just isn’t there. Best we get is a deadly stare in Bettie’s eyes that closes the movie—To Be Continued to be sure; only the question is, to be continued in Sleeper or another story before or after Sleeper? Guess I’ll have to find out later.

Still Life (Short Film) (2012)

17 Feb

195063459_295

Smith’s Verdict: ****

Reviewed by Tanner Smith

“You ever feel like this place is just sinkin’ into the ground? I do everything I can to try to hang on to the edge of this hole, waitin’ on somebody to reach down and pull me out. But everybody that’s pulled me out’s down here with me.” –Line of dialogue from Still Life

Still Life is a touching, effective drama about a man who feels like he’s hit rock bottom and has to rely on his community to get everything on track. The man’s name is Daniel (Lynnsee Provence). He’s a widower who has just lost his job and has trouble making ends meet for him and his six-year-old son named Jack (Luke Ferguson).

The film is pretty much just about a day in which Daniel seeks work, guidance, and help. It takes place in the Arkansas Delta, which, from someone who has grown up in Northeast Arkansas (namely me), is an environment that makes you feel surrounded/trapped by everything around you because there’s something empty and yet at the same time something peaceful presenting itself. That’s how Daniel and many of the people he’s acquainted with, whom we meet as the film progresses, feel. Some are used to it; others are too busy thinking about more for themselves and their families to feel anything but resentment. Still Life shows a great portrait of that. It’s also effective in how it shows its supporting characters—Daniel’s sister-in-law Bethany (Raeden Greer) who sometimes looks after Jack while also dealing with a rough relationship (there’s a revealing moment when Daniel asks her to leave and she snaps, saying there’s nowhere else to go); Daniel’s old buddy (Terence Rose) and his wife (Jahquis Bailey) who are there for him but aren’t the best people to talk about tragedy; even Daniel’s landlady (Fran Austin) looks like there’s something missing in her life, judging from her emotionless face as she smokes a cigarette and asks for Daniel’s rent.

The film is the graduate thesis film of Allison Hogue, writer and director of the film, for the University of Central Arkansas Digital Filmmaking Master of Fine Arts Program. Hogue made last year’s Hitchhiker, a well-executed fantasy-mystery short. With Still Life, it’s her chance to tell a story more based upon reality. Hogue is a gifted filmmaker who succeeds at showing everything she was obviously getting across, and in a subtle way, too—not just exposition explaining exactly how everything went wrong. We can piece things together with almost every scene as the film progresses. Some things are obvious, but most aren’t shoved in your face.

Still Life opens and ends with quotations from Mark Twain—one from “Tom Sawyer,” the other from “Huckleberry Finn.” The first quote sets the tone for the movie—particularly the main character’s feeling of emptiness. The second one appears after an ending that is just right for the film. It doesn’t simply show that everything gets resolved. It’s merely hinted at. It tells us that life goes on and there will always be a way to deal with it.

Still Life ran for almost twenty-nine minutes. Considering some of the short films I’ve seen at the Little Rock Film Festival, where this was shown, it’s saying something when I say at no point was I checking my phone for the time. That’s the sign of a film that has you invested from beginning to end…and a film about life, at that.

NOTE: The film can be seen here: https://vimeo.com/75462622